Tuesday, May 21, 2024
HomeEconomyWhy Shouldn’t We Apply Life Cycle Investing in Dot?

Why Shouldn’t We Apply Life Cycle Investing in Dot?

October 04, 2023 (MLN): When the legendary poet William Shakespeare composed the poem “The Seven Stages of Life” he had hardly imagined that the theme of the poem “Life Cycle” would permeate from the social boundaries to the business domain to the extent that it would ubiquitously be accepted as a business strategy for product development to marketing and from business to personal investing.

Life Cycle Investing is an investing approach that offers a comprehensive framework for managing personal investment to meet changing financial needs throughout life by taking into stock social needs and economic constraints right from the start of professional life to the end of it.

                                                                                                                                     

Age (in Years)

20 to 30

31 to 50

50 to 60

60 +

Life Cycle Investing Phase

Early to Mid-Career

Mid-Career

Post Mid-Career

Retirement

Investment Mix

 

 

 

 

Cash

10%

10%

10%

10%

Stock

60%

55%

40%

25%

Bond

30%

35%

50%

65%

The above image and the table offer a glimpse of what Life Cycle Investing is and how to practice to ensure financial comfort at all stages of life by fragmenting social needs age-wise and translating those into financial goals, investment horizon, and risk tolerance, and by proposing an optimal investment mix for each stage of life.

The above investment mix appears conclusively correct when seen from the vantage of Western Society, as the concept is deeply ingrained in the West's social, psychological, educational, experiential, and economic backgrounds.

But what about when it comes to practising in our society? Should it be adapted verbatim? The two differ socially and economically despite some similarities. Ours is a family-oriented, socially obliged, conservative, and economically less privileged than the West. The following table offers an age-wise segmented view of the social needs and economic priorities of individuals living in two societies.

Age

20 – 30 Years

31 – 50 Years

50 – 60 Years

Retirement

Life Cycle Phase

 

Early – Mid Career

 

Mid-Career

 

Post Mid-Career

 

Retirement

 

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

Social Factors

Single/Independent

No family support

Focus on Career

Longer Working

Single

Support Family

Focus on Career

Long Working

Family–Kids

Financing Kids’ Education

Family-kids

Parents

Supporting Family

Financing Kids’ Education

No family

Kids moved

No family support

Kids Edu.

Exp./ Merge

Medical Coverage

Old home

 

Poor/

Expensive 

Medical Coverage

 

Economic Factors

Education Loan

Long earnings stream

More job opportunity

Little saving

Long

Earnings Stream

Less

Job Opp. 

Little/No Saving

Paid much of the debt

Expenses

Income Exceeds Expenses

Reasonable Saving

Income not Exceeding

much Exp

Higher Disposable Income

 

Peak Income

Inflow of Inv. Inc.

Low Disposable Income

Peak Income

Little Inflow of Inv. Income

Social Security

Suffice Pension

Suff. Inc.

From Inv.

 

Less Social Security

No Pension

Inc. from Inv.

Inv. Horizon

Long

40+ years for Inv

Long

40+ years for Inv

Long

30+ Years for Inv.

Long

30+ Years for Inv.

Medium

20+ Years for Inv.

Medium

20+ Years

Short

Short

Inv. Goals

Retire Educational Loan

Buy a Car

To support Family

Saving

emergency

Save for Home / Retirement

Asset Growth

Inv. For Emergencies Fulfill family obligations

Secure Retirement

Financially

Preserve

Capital

Secure

Retirement

Financially

Preserve

Capital

Liquid Assets & Outlive Saving

Liquid

Assets &

Outlive

Saving

Return Objective

Higher Return

Return Preserve Cap

Higher Return

Moderate Return

Return Preserve

 Cap

Return Preserve Cap

Stable Return

Stable Return

Risk Profile

Aggressive

Conservative

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Very Low

Very Low

Investing Phase

Wealth Accumulation

Wealth Accumulation

Wealth Accumulation

Wealth Accumulation

Consolidation

Consolidation

Spending

Spending

Similarities between socioeconomic profiles of individuals who fall within a specific age bracket convincingly validate that the concept is equally applicable in our environment. However, the variations within eloquently ask for a conservative approach when adapting an investment mix with a dot.

Concerns for preserving capital, while investing to fulfill recurring financial obligations and to ensure a financially secure retirement, is more than justifiable in a society with fewer economic resources and opportunities.

Therefore, the table below offers a modified version investment mix from the Eastern perspective for each stage of Life Cycle Investing.

Age

20 – 30 Years

31 – 50 Years

50 – 60 Years

Retirement

Life Cycle Phase

 

Early – Mid Career

 

Mid-Career

 

Post Mid-Career

 

Retirement

Inv. Mix

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

Cash

10%

50%

10%

30%

10%

30%

35%

30%

Stock

60%

10%

30%

20%

40%

20%

5%

5%

Bond

30%

40%

60%

50%

50%

50%

60%

65%

So, liberate yourself from the fear of age syndrome and set in for an investing journey destined for a financially independent and secure post-retirement life as promised by the Life Cycle Investing Strategy. 

This reminds me of a Chinese proverb:

“The Best Time to Plant a Tree Was 30 Years Ago, and the Second-Best Time to Plant a Tree is Now.”

Copyright Mettis Link News

Posted on:2023-10-04T16:43:20+05:00

40750

RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular